A Need for Balance

July 1st, 2009

The objective of this strategy is the protection of society by reducing youth crime.
Protection of society is, first and foremost, achieved by preventing crime. This requires concerted effort by all levels of government and other partners employing preventive approaches designed to address the root causes of crime. Crime prevention is a significant part of the government’s efforts to reduce crime, is especially important for young people, who are more susceptible to environmental influences, and carries long-lasting benefits for society.
Society is also protected, however, by having a youth justice system that commands respect, fosters responsibility, ensures accountability and makes it clear that violations of the law will meet with meaningful consequences.
Young people who commit crimes must be held accountable and responsible for their actions. They must learn that criminal behaviour offends society’s collective values and is met with consequences. It is important to recognize, however, that often the most meaningful consequences for the vast majority of non-violent young offenders, their victims and communities are those that instruct youth about the impact of the crime on others and require that efforts be made to repay those who were hurt. This fosters respect not only for the legal system but for underlying social values.
An effective youth justice system must be capable of responding to the range of crimes committed by young people. The government has made progress in addressing adult crime by taking firm measures with violent and high-risk offenders while encouraging community-based alternatives for lower-risk, non-violent offenders. Different approaches are also appropriate for the small number of young offenders who commit very violent crimes and for the vast majority of non-violent young offenders.
The belief in the rehabilitative capacity of young people is a fundamental principle of the youth justice system. Successful rehabilitation protects society and prevents further victimization, particularly since youth return to their communities at a relatively young age. This fact makes rehabilitation especially important for violent young offenders. Rehabilitation is also a key part of society’s responsibility towards young people.
The renewal of youth justice thus proceeds on several fronts: prevention to address the root causes of youth crime; meaningful consequences for youth crime; and rehabilitation to help young people turn away from crime. It is a strategy that includes reform of our youth justice legislation but extends beyond it.

Source: Unknown

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Things have to change, or life as we know it will

June 30th, 2009

The economy of each country depends on its long term planning and predictions. The planners future thinking based on current facts help the economy stable and “worrying free”.
The current situation of shortfall of electricity in the country is a result of poor planning. The Government is planning, not doing, to remove these crisis by renting power plants, not their own, and predicting that it will end in the end of 2009.
Each Pakistani, especially industrialist is moaning on this issue but the question is “is there really any planning now for the next 50 years?”
An other crisis which is going to be in existence id “impact of climate change”. The prospect of temperature rise across the world and especially in developing countries is in fact hugley scary. The implications for life as we know it are massive and to be avoided at all cost – literally.
The projections shown by the experts show us the future we need to avoid and to need to plan for the future. The reports of environment Agency reports that the temperature will rise 5-8 degree till 2040 coping with the impact of threat from climate change making double the investment required for shortage of water.
Of course, adapting to the kind of future scenarios forecast, climate impact programming will clearly require much, much investment. Life for increasing numbers living in the country will get more disasters and poverty. More resources and planning is required to face the future challenges.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Failed States Index

June 29th, 2009

Recently a report has been published in newspapers where Pakistan has been stated as failed states at number 9 in the list as Somalia is at No. 1

What is the true fact and how this index is calculated, you can visit the website http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4350&page=1.

We should not close the eyes and issue statements against any fact but to consider it politely and remove the objection raised in the report removing from the list.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Global Corruption Barometer and Pakistan

June 5th, 2009

What is the Global Corruption Barometer?

The Global Corruption Barometer is a survey that assesses general public attitudes toward and experience of corruption in dozens of countries around the world.

Transparency International’s 2009 Global Corruption Barometer reveals a growing distrust of business, the daily struggle of the world’s poor with petty bribery and public unconvinced of governments’ anti-corruption efforts.

A global public opinion survey, the 2009 Barometer reflects the views of more than 73,000 people from 69 countries and territories around the world.

Consumers demand zero corruption

From mitigating financial, legal and reputational risks to generating stable returns, the business case against corruption is unquestionable. The 2009 Barometer shows that zero corruption matters to consumers as well. Half of respondents globally expressed a willingness to pay a premium to buy from corruption-free companies. In Cambodia, Hong Kong, Liberia and Sierra Leone, this number rose to as many as 4 in 5 respondents. Making the business case against corruption even more persuasive, this finding provides business with a powerful incentive to prove that they are clean and to communicate this clearly with the public.

Companies must do more, though, to address the challenges posed by corruption. More than half of those polled believe that the private sector uses bribes to influence public policy, laws and regulations. Half of respondents view the private sector as corrupt. Moreover, in roughly a fifth of the countries and territories surveyed, respondents identified the private sector as the most corrupt institution.

World’s poor persistently hard hit

The global economic downturn has affected people around the world, but in particular the poorest. As jobs and incomes shrink, petty bribery compounds the already difficult situation of low-income households. The 2009 Barometer reveals that low-income respondents continue to be more likely to pay bribes than high-income respondents.

“As economic growth shifts into reverse, poor households are increasingly forced to make impossible choices in allocating scarce resources,” said Huguette Labelle, Chair, Transparency International. “Do parents pay a bribe so that a sick child can see a doctor or do they buy food for their family? It is simply unacceptable that families continue to face these decisions.”

In Cameroon, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Uganda, more than 50 per cent of respondents reported paying a bribe in the past 12 months. Regionally, the Middle East and North Africa registered the worst results, with 4 in 10 respondents reporting bribe payments in the last year. Worryingly, petty bribery was reported to be on the rise in Venezuela, Ghana, Indonesia, Cambodia, Bolivia, Senegal, Russia and Kenya. The police are most frequently reported to be given bribes worldwide – one in four of those who had contact with them in the previous year claim to have paid a bribe.

Government efforts lacking

More than half of those interviewed in the 2009 Barometer rated their governments’ anti-corruption efforts as ineffective. Fewer than 1 in 10 respondents in Argentina, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania and Ukraine considered their governments’ efforts effective. In comparison, 7 in 10 or more respondents in Brunei Darussalam, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Nigeria and Singapore see their governments’ efforts to be effective.

In keeping with past editions of the Barometer, 68 per cent of respondents view political parties as corrupt, and 29 per cent saw them as the single most corrupt institution in their country. The civil service and parliament follows closely behind, perceived by 63 and 60 per cent of respondents as being corrupt.

The legitimacy and effectiveness of official channels for making corruption-related complaints are not trusted. Fewer than one in four of respondents who reported paying a bribe in the previous year filed a formal complaint, while most of those interviewed felt that existing channels were ineffective.

Corruption in Pakistan

Key sectors affected by corruption in Pakistan and recent diagnostic material

To fully respond to the question as to which sectors are most affected by corruption, both quantitative (through diagnostic material) and qualitative (through reports and direct questioning of international and national experts) sources have been consulted. Nevertheless, it is worth bearing in mind that some of the reasons that particular sectors are highlighted more often than others are due not only to objective merits but also to the facts that i) there is more research and survey work done in those areas and ii) public perception and awareness seem to be more vocal as regards those areas. Thus, the exercise of highlighting some of the sectors should be read with the knowledge that corruption in Pakistan seems pervasive across most sectors. With that in mind, it is safe to say that expert sources indicate that the following sectors are among those most affected by corruption (the particular order varies from source to source):

Police and law enforcement
Judiciary and legal profession
Power sector
Tax and customs
Health and education
Land administration
In addition, Public Procurement seems to be a major concern across most sectors
Examples of reform initiatives in some of these sectors are provided in Part II (see below).

These sectors seem to be affected by chains of:

1. Petty corruption to access public services or to bypass the law (through the direct interaction of citizens with the respective authorities and bribe-paying)

2. Middle and grand corruption (through corruption in public contracting and procurement as well as direct misappropriation of public funds by senior officials).

3. In addition, political patronage, conflicts of interest, influence peddling and other forms of corrupt behaviour are commonplace across the sectors.

1. Reforms in sectors rated to be amongst those most affected by corruption

Police and law enforcement

Corruption in the police and law enforcement is perceived to be pervasive – creating a culture of lawlessness and lack of credibility and trust in authorities. The police and law enforcement appointments are often politicised and full of conflict of interest. Criminals and rent-seeking and extortionist authorities are often the sole beneficiaries of the game.

Police reforms were instituted about two and a half years ago by President Musharraf but, according to certain expert voices, have been significantly watered down by the elected government, which still sees political patronage of police officers as important. However, a system of recruitment of better quality and standards is being implemented with improvements in areas of professional training, competence development and remuneration. A great deal remains to be done to implement full police reforms including the establishment of public safety commissions and an effective independent police complaints authority.

It is hoped that the reorganisation outlined by the new Police Order of 2002 and the Police Complaints department will improve the functions of the police and provide relief to the citizens. Reportedly, one of the first steps taken in the reorganization has been the separation of the police force into various branches, divisions, bureaus and sections. It is intended to help improve the efficiency but in fact may lead to more corruption and less efficiency due to non-cooperation or lack of coordination. The Police Order of 2002 has also outlined a format for setting up district Public Safety Commissions (PSC). The functions of such commissions will inter alia include investigations of complaints on excesses and neglect against police officers and encourage greater police-public participation. The PSCs are to be set up within the Federal and Provincial Government and the District and Town Local Governments. There shall also be a National Public Safety Commission. Further, the Order makes provisions for setting up of federal and provincial police complaints authorities for enquiring into serious complaints against the members of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies. Other measures provided for by the Order include the establishment of the Criminal Justice Coordination committee, to work on the improvement of the system as a whole and promote good practices, and of the National Police Management Board, to work on overall technical and human resource capacity building within the Police.

Judiciary and legal profession

There is widespread lack of public confidence in the institutional legitimacy of the justice system. Access to justice and the rule of law are undermined by corruption and are under a threat. Alongside the corrupt judiciary is the legal profession with low ethics of lawyers and poor controls of the bodies (such as the Pakistan Bar Council) responsible for maintaining the high standards that should be required of it.

Reform efforts have included:

a) Access to Justice Programme
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has in 2001 approved Access to Justice Programme loans totalling US$ 350 million due for completion towards the end of 2004 with Pakistan’s Ministry of Law, Justice, Human Rights and Parliamentary Affairs (MOL) as the Executing Agency hosting the programme management unit (PMU). The Programme is built around five inter-related governance objectives: (i) providing a legal basis for judicial, policy, and administrative reforms; (ii) improving the efficiency, timeliness, and effectiveness in judicial and police services; (iii) supporting greater equity and accessibility in justice services for the vulnerable poor; (iv) improving predictability and consistency between fiscal and human resource allocation and the mandates of reformed judicial and police institutions at the federal, provincial and local government levels; and (v) ensuring greater transparency and accountability in the performance of the judiciary, the police and administrative justice institutions.

There are mixed signals about the success of the reforms. It has been voiced that the efforts are perceived to be lacking tangible outcomes and that there have been some challenges in terms of the project implementation itself (sources: NIS country study and an independent expert).

b) Supreme Judicial Council
Efforts are underway to activate the Supreme Judicial Council through international experts working with the Attorney General, the Chief Justice and the President’s office.
For further information contact Ms. Shazadi Beg, involved in international consultancy in Pakistan, at shaz.beg@btopenworld.com.

c) Accountability Courts
In 1999, following the coup, Accountability Courts (lapsed as of 1994) have been once again set up throughout the country to decide cases under the amended National Accountability Bureau Ordinance. These Accountability Courts were established for speedy disposal of cases involving corruption and corrupt practices, misuse, abuse of power, misappropriation of property, kickbacks, commissions and the matters connected and ancillary or incidental thereto. The Accountability Courts have so far announced judgments in several high profile corruption cases. Criticism with regards to selective accountability and political motives has been voiced in terms of the courts on a number of occasions, while the NAB and some others have been counter-arguing in defence of the integrity of the practices.

Public sector procurement and contracting

There have been major concerns in this area. There is large-scale corruption in procurement and contracting affecting government and development aid funded programmes, public works, etc. Some of the systemic weaknesses have included the lack of a standardised procurement regime (sets of clear, transparent rules and legislation) along with absence of repository of procurement expertise in the government. Grounds and opportunities for corruption are provided at every stage of the procurement process (from preparation to tender, bid evaluation, negotiations, and contracting).

Some of the reform efforts include:

a) Establishment of a public procurement regulatory authority
For years, several agencies and groups have been recommending the establishment of a single regulatory authority for public procurement, such as the WB in its Country Procurement Assessment report of 1997, as well as TI during its country mission in 2002. In June 2002, the PPRA was promulgated by the President for regulating procurement of goods, services and works in the public sector and for matters connected therewith or ancillary thereto; and extended to the whole of Pakistan. The PPRA, which comprises the Secretary, Finance Division (chair), and the Secretaries of Ministry of Industries and Production, Defence Production Division, Ministry of Water and Power, Ministry of Housing and Works, Ministry of Communications and three members from private sector nominated by the Federal Government, can take such measures and exercise such powers as may be necessary for improving governance, management, transparency, accountability and quality of public procurement of goods, services and works in the public sector. It may monitor application of the laws and procedures; recommend revisions in or formulation of new laws, rules and policies in respect of or related to public procurement; make regulations and lay down codes of ethics and procedures for public procurement, inspection or quality of goods, services and works; monitor public procurement practices and make recommendations to improve governance, transparency, accountability and quality of public procurement; monitor overall performance of procuring agencies and make recommendations for improvements in their institutional set up and other.

Some reports (such as NACS related sources) suggest that the agency, however, has not been properly staffed and needs capacity building if it is to perform the intended functions.

b) Resolution related to procurement standards
In 2002, the National Accountability Bureau as a part of its study in preparing the NACS organised an international workshop, resulting in the stakeholders adopting a resolution related to ensuring transparency in Public Procurement in Pakistan. This resolution was incorporated in the NACS report and was approved by the Ministerial Cabinet and the President of Pakistan in October 2002. Amongst others, the recommendations provide that:

the Standard Procedures for Procurement of Works, Goods and Consultants should be revised by the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority. Either the World Bank or PEC by-laws should be uniformly implemented in all government and semi government departments till such time the PPRA prepares its own Guidelines;
to ensure transparency and public participation, the Transparency International-Pakistan tool ‘Integrity Pact” should be made an integral part of all tenders;
for every new project, public hearings should be made mandatory for scrutiny of necessity of the project and for the environmental assessment, prior to concept clearance approval;
evaluation Committees for Pre-qualification and Award of Contracts must include at least two departmental members, and a minimum of three independent experts, (One each from the Pakistan Engineering Council, Institute of Chartered Accountants and FPCCI), and others.

c) Integrity pacts
An important part of the recommendations of the NACS is the incorporation of the TI Integrity Pacts in all contracts for goods and services where the estimated cost of the project is over Rupees 5 million for consultancy and over Rupees 50 million for Construction Contracts. This has been a major breakthrough in the efforts of TI-Pakistan whereby all major contracts will not only provide for the “Integrity Pact” but also include all other recommendations, which have been put out in the NACS Document (outlined above). An example of the Integrity Pact in use is to be found in the Greater Karachi Water Supply Scheme (KIII Project) project. An integrity pact, with a formal no-bribery commitment, was signed by KWSB, consultant bidders and TI Pakistan. It resulted in a successful bid of Rs 62 million ($1.04m) against the reserved fees of Rs 249m ($4.2m). The project adopted the least costly selection method. The bidding process was monitored by Transparency International- Pakistan to ensure it is clean and transparent. In the event of a breach of the Integrity Pact, sanctions come into force against the bidders and officials, including liability for damages, and blacklisting from future tenders. The procurement process is to be followed by monitoring of the contract by civil society, specifically TI Pakistan. The Karachi government had expressed plans to apply the same transparent process to other projects.

2. Reform initiatives in other areas
While, as mentioned above, detailing all general reform efforts in Pakistan over the last few years is out of the scope of this U4 answer, below are summaries of reform efforts in some additional sectors and areas that might be of interest for the purposes of this query. The listing is by no means exhaustive; there are other general reforms and we thus recommend to consult the further resources listed in Part III, in addition to this U4 answer.

Public Service: Efforts are under way on the part of the government to reform the Federal and Provincial Public service commissions, particularly with regards to capacity and competence building. Further, the World Bank has approved a US$55 million IDA credit in May 2004 for Public Sector Capacity Building Projects that will fund the training and professional development of over 500 public servants, enhancing the capacity in key ministries/agencies which are in the forefront of designing, implementing and monitoring policy reform. It will also aim to strengthen some key regulatory agencies, specifically NEPRA (National Electric Power Regulatory Authority), OGRA (Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority) and PTA (Pakistan Telecommunication Authority).

Public sector financial management: It is suggested that some of the weaknesses may be addressed by the government’s Project to Improve Financial Reporting and Auditing (PIFRA). The World Bank has carried out a country Financial Accountability Assessment in December 2003 (the report is available on WB Pakistan’s website at www.worldbank.org.pk or can be emailed by the U4 helpdesk upon request). Further, the ADB has approved a US$ 204 mln loan (part of a wider sequence) to support the Government of Punjab. Among other objectives, the programme aims to improve the effectiveness and accountability of financial management by bringing in transparent and user-friendly budgets and accounts, and financial and procurement systems (further details can be found on ADB website at http://www.adb.org/Documents/News/2003/nr2003175.asp).

Financial oversight bodies: The Supreme Audit Institution of the country (the Auditor General’s office) is trying to reform itself by following international best practices, such as those of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI), as part of its reform agenda. It has been noted that there seems to be some progress in reorganizing the department with a view to adopting modern techniques of audit and reporting formats. It has initiated a capacity building program under the project to improve Financial Reporting and Auditing (PIFRA). Some of the other reform efforts include the design of diagnostic tools, such as a “Financial Government Rating Index (FGRI)” and an “Internal Quality Rating (IQR) for its departments, etc.

Public Accounts Committee: the PAC was for a number of years operating as an ad-hoc body in need of serious reform efforts. In December of 2003, a Standing Committee on Public Accounts was finally established comprising about 18 members including the present Minister for Finance (ex-officio).

Independent Anti-Corruption Agencies: the Government of Pakistan has undertaken a number of steps to strengthen the Anti-Corruption Agencies, and has especially concentrated on the National Accountability Bureau for its reforms. The reforms include the creation of NAB as the sole Anti Corruption Agency at the Federal level; adding the functions of prevention through research and monitoring and public awareness and coalition building with civil society to NAB’s mandate; provisions on appointments of ACAs (from the elected opposition members) and security of tenure of key office bearers of the ACA and others. Further reforms and restructuring are in the process.

Local Government: the Devolution programme (forming part of the local government plan built around decentralization of administrative authority, de-concentration of management functions, diffusion of the power-authority nexus, and distribution of resources to the district level) of handing over local governance to the local levels and the people is deemed to be progressing satisfactory. The Devolution programme is coordinated by the National Reconstruction Bureau. Some survey tools (mentioned in Part I of this U4 answer) have been developed in cooperation with CIET International to measure progress and the impact of the process on public service delivery at local levels.

Civil society and public participation: It has been noted that civil society and non-governmental organisations are being engaged in government’s committees, task forces and other advisory and oversight roles. So, for example, the local government is now required to establish various bodies that are to act as “watchdogs” and contribute inter alia towards the fight against corruption. These are to be set up in each town where citizens can take part in the direct monitoring of the Police, Judiciary, the District Government and others. These include the district Public Safety Commission to prevent unlawful or motivated use of police by the District Nazim; a Police Complaints Authority which will address serious complaints against police; Citizens Community Boards (comprising of civil society representatives) for energizing the community for development and improvement in service delivery through voluntary and self help initiatives as well as for carrying out citizen monitoring of the local government; local Ombudsman schemes and other bodies.

Freedom of Information and Media: Several ordinances have been promulgated in 2002, including the Freedom of Information Ordinance, the Press Council of Pakistan Ordinance and others. While this legislation has scope for major improvements, it is a reasonable first step to build on.

Resources :
http://www.pakistan.gov.pk/law-division/policies/ajp.htm and
http://www.adb.org/Documents/Others/PRM_Supplement/ADB_PAK_Governance_Reforms.asp?p=prmnews
http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/gcb_2007GLOBAL CORRUPTION BAROMETER (GCB) 2009
http://www.u4.no/helpdesk/helpdesk/queries/query43.cfm

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

New Zealand named world’s most peaceful nation, Pakistan on 137th position.

June 4th, 2009

The South Pacific nation of four million people and 40 million sheep has knocked Iceland off its perch after violent demonstrations followed the collapse of Reykjavik’s banking system.

The Global Peace Index, a report prepared for the Australia-based Institute for Economics and Peace in conjunction with the Economist Intelligence Unit, ranks 144 countries in a league table of peacefulness.

The index defines peace as “the absence of violence”.

Twenty-three criteria on which the league table is compiled include political stability, risk of terrorism, murder rate, likelihood of violent demonstrations, respect for human rights, internal conflicts, arms imports and involvement in foreign wars.

It will be a source of quiet satisfaction for New Zealanders that Australia, their great rival across the Tasman Sea, managed to score only 19th place.

Nordic countries Denmark and Norway took their accustomed positions near the top of the table.

Britain, by comparison, was 35th, slightly higher than last year but one place below Botswana and one higher than Italy. Britain also ranks below most of the rest of Europe.

The United States came 83rd, dragged down by two foreign wars, a high prison population, and the wide availability of guns.

Its position did, however, mark a rise of six places, attributed to the number of years that have passed since 9/11 without suffering another terrorist attack.

Iraq was last for the third of the three years since the index was launched.

The report says the global economic recession and an increase in violent conflict and political instability around the planet took a toll on world peacefulness in 2008.

Clyde McConaghy of the Institute for Economics and Peace said: “Peace is a concrete aim that can be measured and valued, not just in social terms but in economic terms.

“There is a clear correlation between the economic crisis and the decline in peace.”

In New Zealand, the report says last year’s election of a Centre-Right government “with a strong popular mandate and a robust parliamentary majority” was a factor contributing to peacefulness.

Analysts also attribute the country’s relative racial harmony in part to a now well-established institutional system for addressing historic Maori grievances.

Professor Kevin Clements, of Otago University in Dunedin, said: “The index is a pretty good reflection of countries people want to live in, because on bicultural issues and a variety of factors we are scoring well.

“If you look at the top 20, they are all small nations based on strong welfare principles, all with good and relatively uncorrupt governance.”

Top 10 most peaceful nations: 1 New Zealand, 2 Denmark, 3 Norway, 4 Iceland, 5 Austria, 6 Sweden, 7 Japan, 8 Canada, 9= Finland, 9= Slovenia.

Ten least peaceful: 1 Iraq, 2 Afghanistan, 3 Somalia, 4 Israel, 5 Sudan, 6 Democratic Republic of the Congo, 7 Chad, 8 Pakistan, 9 Russia, 10 Zimbabwe.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/5433581/New-Zealand-named-worlds-most-peaceful-nation.html dated: 03 Jun 2009
By Paul Chapman in Wellington

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Don’t bring God into politics: Noted cleric

June 3rd, 2009

Politicians have a very different nature. When they smell that their popularity is moving behind the wall, they raise any such issue which will boil the atmosphere and graph of their popularity will begin to rise. In Islamic countries, they mostly raise the issue relating to religion. Each Islamic state have different sects of Muslims. The statements against one sect or any un-Islamic tradition or news, normally blow up their popularity. In Pakistan, about 10 years before, Shia Sunni conflicts were the main issues and now terrorist activities are the bad images of Pakistan in the world. Indonesia is also one of the biggest Islamic state where politicians do not spoil any such opportunity to get popularity using political tricks.
Recently “Respected Muslim cleric Ahmad Mustofa “Gus Mus” Bisri has called on politicians to stop using religion in politics, saying God should stay away from political buzz.”

“Use political science in politics. Don’t bring God into politics,” Gus Mus, a senior figure with Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), Indonesia’s largest Muslim organization, said when receiving his Doctor Honoris Causa from Yogyakarta’s Sunan Kalijaga Islamic State University (IAIN) on Saturday.

The moderate cleric, who is also a poet, voiced his strong objection of the use of “religious symbols” in Indonesian political activities.

He said religions, particularly Islam, which is embraced by the majority of Indonesians, were often used as political tools by politicians to win support in elections.

In his inaugural doctoral speech entitled “Fortifying Cultural Islam, toward Humanity and Harmony”, he also said Indonesian Muslims, as the majority in the country, should be held responsible for the condition of the nation, be it good or bad.

He said many Muslim Indonesians had failed to understand the true meaning of Islamic teachings due to their focus on fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) rather than content.

What happens now is that “Islam’s beauty” only appears in the five “pillars of Pancasila”, the state ideology, not in the real life of Muslims, he added.

He also questioned Indonesian Muslims’ understanding of Islam, particularly in relation to God.

He warned ritual religious services carried out by Indonesian Muslims had unconsciously shifted from their principal Islamic meaning, which led to incorrect conduct.

“Does religion wasilah *an Arabic term for tool or vehicle*, or become ghoyah *an Arabic term for goal*?

“Islam in Indonesia has been too *focused* on fiqh. We always hear about halal *lawful* and haram *forbidden*; about cigarettes being haram and Facebook being haram.

“But this is not what Islam is all about. *We have to also focus* on how Islam can bring about tranquility for humankind.”

He added misinterpretations of Islam had led to the absence of its values in everyday life.

Din Syamsuddin, chairman of the country’s second largest Muslim organization Muhammadiyah, said Gus Mus deserved the Doctor Honoris Causa degree because, as the caretaker of the Taman Pelajar Rembang Islamic boarding school in Rembang in Central Java, he had given many colors to the culture of Islam in the country.

“In terms of Indonesia’s culture, Gus Mus’ thoughts and works have truly contributed to the development of Islamic culture,” said Din, who attended the inauguration ceremony on the IAIN campus.

IAIN Sunan Kalijaga rector Amin Abdullah said Gus Mus deserved the honor because his thoughts and personality were in line with the visions of the Islamic state university.

Also attending the event were other prominent Muslim scholars and cultural figures, such as Emha Ainun Nadjib, Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Butet Kertaradjasa, and Constitutional Court chief M. Mahfud MD.

Source: http://www.thejakar tapost.com/ news/2009/ 06/01/don039t- bring-god- politics- noted-cleric. html

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Indonesian’s “honesty cafes”, a challenge to Pakistani culture

June 1st, 2009

Recently I was reading a news from a Indonesian Newspaper GlobalPost where an article written by Peter Gelling Published on May 30, 2009 appealed to me to reproduce it with thanks so our leaders can establish such cafes in Pakistan too to create a HONESTY culture in the country.
I remember when I was in secondary school during 1968 “Islamia High School Gatti, Faisalabad, Pakistan, our class teacher Muhammad Amin, have such experience at the time of collection of monthly fees and only one student was dishonest who did not deposit his fee. However to create a honesty culture, such experience are not bad.

“JAKARTA — Indonesia is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Transparency International ranks it 126 out of 180 nations — worse than Nigeria, but better than Myanmar. And so a handful of progressive leaders are trying anything they can to stem the overwhelming problem. In fact, the strategies to end graft are these days almost as imaginative as the graft itself.
In East Kalimantan, a province full of natural resources that has been a gold mine for corrupt government officials and businessmen, the local governor recently announced he would open almost 1,500 cafes without cashiers throughout the province. Patrons would be expected to take what they want and leave the appropriate amount of cash in return.
The so-called “honesty cafes” are an attempt to instill ethics into the youth who have been raised in an atmosphere where corruption is everywhere. Almost all Indonesians have paid bribes to government officials and police at some point in their lives and many of them pay bribes on a regular basis. Something as simple as an identification card requires a few extra dollars for the issuing official.
“There are many people with very little discipline,” said Zairin, a spokesperson for the East Kalimantan governor. “They throw garbage everywhere, smoke in public places and are prone to corruption. This program is aimed at the root of the problem, the culture.”
The hope is that patrons of the cafes will feel compelled to leave the correct amount of money, and if they don’t, they will face the condemnation of their peers. The cafes will first be introduced into schools throughout the province, and then offices and possibly even on the street.
“It is so important that Indonesia’s younger generation grow up with a better understanding of what is right and what is wrong so they are more disciplined and less likely to take part in corrupt activities,” Zairin said. “This anti-corruption campaign targets the youth so that Indonesia can have a better future.”
The fight really began with the creation of the powerful Anti-Corruption Commission shortly after Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono was elected president in 2004. Ever since, high-profile arrests are splashed across the front pages on a daily basis. Local reporters are stationed outside the commission’s offices almost 24 hours a day to catch parliamentarians, businessmen, judges, banking officials and governors being brought in for questioning — the sort of “perp walk” that can instantly end careers.
The revealed tales of respected lawmakers caught with satchels full of cash on their way to late night hotel room meetings are so common here they have become cliche.
Not satisfied with prosecutions alone, the commission has several times floated the idea of forcing graft suspects to wear special uniforms, or a scarlet letter, to single them out as corrupt. The idea, however, has not yet been approved for fear of making suspects seem guilty before a trial.
But the commission is desperate to find new ways of fighting graft. In the last five years it has had many successes, but has not yet netted any “big fish” and has failed to prosecute some important cases.
Worst yet, on May 4 the commission’s director, Antasari Azhar, was arrested in connection with the mob-style murder of a businessman and golf buddy, leading to his dismissal. The media here has widely assumed his guilt but the director has many obvious and powerful enemies and his attorneys are claiming he was framed. At least one major police official and a media mogul have also been brought in for questioning.
In short, the fight against graft here, made endemic by Suharto, the country’s kleptocrat ruler for almost 30 years, is an uphill one.
Even when it comes with a hit of coffee or a plate of nasi goreng.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Two faces of a Coin

May 30th, 2009

The recent revival of religion around the globe has raised fundamental questions not only about its role in both national and international politics, but also concerning its claim to serve as a principle of identity indispensable to the continuing survival of communities and peoples across the generations. There are many who would argue strenuously that the sense of belonging to a community is seriously weakened in the absence of a shared religious commitment. Others would insist just as strenuously that social and public life should be both conceived and organised in essentially secular terms. This lecture series debates this crucial contemporary theme.

There’s a really interesting and important piece in a recent edition of the International Herald Tribune, Only traditional Islam can do it, by Phillip Blond a senior lecturer in philosophy and religion at the University of Cumbria (also an established Radical Orthodoxy luminary) and Adrian Pabst, lecturer in theology at the University of Nottingham.

What they are essentially arguing for is a strongly tradition-rooted resistance, from among Muslims, to the legitimation of terror within present, politicized Islam. Contemporary Islamic fundamentalism is, they point out, modern and heretical rather than ‘traditional’ – contrary to the mistaken assumptions of many commentators and a superficial reporting culture. (I think it’s inevitably more cloudy than that, but in the final analysis they are correct.)

So, they write, “given that we are losing the battle of hearts and minds, we would be well advised to chart a different path. By encouraging an Islamic renaissance and reviving traditions that the fundamentalists have so violently suppressed, Muslim youth might be diverted from their present course.” By contrast, trying to make Islam less Muslim (as if it was all corrupt, and non-religious modernity is all benign) is unworkable and counter-productive. Read it all here.

This is clearly related to the recent news stirring about who gets to be imams, how they are formed and equipped, and where they come from. That has actually been a Muslim (and inter-faith) concern for many, many years. And those like Philip Lewis in Bradford, and others, who have tried to get it recognised have often been ignored or misunderstood. So good on the BBC for finally getting there, courtesy of the University of Chester. But the media and government are only just coming up to speed with these things – and they still have no idea about how behind they remain and how much they don’t know.

So I’m essentially in agreement with Blond and Pabst. What will stop Muslims, Christians and other religionists (as well as humanists, atheists and non-believers) from developing into bigots, murderers and haters is not trying to tell them that they must become less Christian or Muslim (say) if they are to be civilized “like us”. It is the recovery of deep traditions of compassion within each of these ways of believing, becoming and behaving.

To make this kind of thing possible, we need living moral communities (congregations, networks, associations) which are also interpretative communities – those who take conscious and collective responsibility for carrying the past into the future in ways that free us, unite us, and respond to visions of humanity and the world which are enriching, compassionate, non-violent and expanding. This is a massive task, I know. The alternative belief in some round-the-corner political fix, or the temptation to seek a new piety (some current secularism has an unhealthy belief in its own inherent goodness and the evil of that which it contends, say) may look overwhelming.

‘Christian ideology’ fails to see this in any way. Thus it becomes part of the problem (essentially ‘Christianism’) rather than part of the solution the Gospel helps us to imagine.

But what Islamic ideology is presenting in the world especially in the UK where a number of Muslims from all over the Islamic and non-Islamic states are living and practicing without any barriers. The path we shall demonstrate to non Muslims has been presented as following in a newspaper.

“Islamist extremists who protested at a parade for returning soldiers have been forced off the streets by an organised demonstration of moderate Muslims. Skip related content
It happened in Luton, prompted by an outcry when the fundamentalists barracked members of the Royal Anglian Regiment during the troops’ homecoming in March.

Bedfordshire Police would not comment on the incident but it is understood no-one was injured in the clash and no arrests were made.

In March, protesters had brandished banners with slogans such as “Butchers of Basra” and “cowards, killers, extremists”.

Afterwards, there was anger and dismay in the town’s wider Muslim community.

Moderate followers of Islam said the protest had played into the hands of extreme right-wing groups and had made their day-to-day lives on the streets of Luton more difficult.

On Friday, after weeks of rising tensions, members of the two groups of Muslims clashed in the town.

Qadeer Baksh, chairman of the Islamic Centre in Luton, said a group of around 200 moderate followers descended on Bury Park, where the extremists regularly preach from a stall, to drive the protesters away.

Numbering about six, the extremists were surrounded and themselves barracked with calls of “We don’t want you here”, said Mr Baksh. Scuffles broke out before police arrived.

Mr Baksh said: “The Muslims of Luton are totally fed up with these boys. Police were unable to get them off the streets and stop them bringing harm to the Muslim community, so we had to. A small minority are giving us a bad name and allowing the British National Party to capitalise. They have made the place insecure for our women and children.”

This piece is slightly adapted from http://faithinsociety.blogspot.com/ and http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090530/tuk-muslims-in-face-off-with-extremists-6323e80.html

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Poverty … The Poor Get Poorer

May 29th, 2009

Poverty is understood in many senses. The main understandings of the term are that poverty in this sense may be understood as the deprivation of essential goods and services. Poverty is an economic condition of lacking both money and basic necessities needed to successfully live such as food, water, education, and shelter. In the sense of social need, it includes social exclusion, dependency, and the ability to participate in society. This would include education and information. Social exclusion is usually distinguished from poverty, as it encompasses political and moral issues, and is not restrained to the sphere of economics.
It is also describes as a lack of sufficient income and wealth. The meaning of “sufficient” varies widely across the different political and economic parts of the world (2006). Poverty is hunger. Poverty is lack of shelter. Poverty is being sick and not being able to see a doctor. Poverty is not having access to school and not knowing how to read. Poverty is not having a job, is fear for the future, living one day at a time. Poverty is losing a child to illness brought about by unclean water. Poverty is powerlessness, lack of representation and freedom.
Although the most severe poverty is in the developing world, there is evidence of poverty in every region. In developed countries, this condition results in wandering homeless people and poor suburbs and ghettos. Poverty may be seen as the collective condition of poor people, or of poor groups, and in this sense entire nation-states are sometimes regarded as poor. To avoid stigma these nations are usually called developing nations.
Poverty can also be conceived as absolute or relative, as lack of income or failure to attain capabilities. It can be chronic or temporary, is sometimes closely associated with inequity, and is often correlated with vulnerabilities and social exclusion
A common method used to measure poverty is based on incomes or consumption levels. Poverty measurement has been dominated by the so-called income approach. This approach to poverty measurement assumes that individuals and households are poor if their income or consumption falls below a certain threshold, usually defined as a minimum, socially acceptable level of well being by a population group. A person is considered poor if his or her consumption or income level falls below some minimum level necessary to meet basic needs. This minimum level is usually called the “poverty line”
The basic needs concept of poverty takes the income approach one step further. This approach attempts to address some of the limitations of the income indicator family by distinguishing between private income, publicly provided services and different forms of nonmonetary “income.” The basic needs approach to poverty measurement includes access to such necessities as food, shelter, schooling, health services, potable water and sanitation facilities, employment opportunities, and even touches on opportunities for community participation. Basic needs indicators are often classified in the “means” category. However, since they are one step closer to outcomes than income measures, they are sometimes placed in a category of their own—“indirect ends.”
Basic needs indicators add a wide range of dimensions to income measures. For example, a rise in housing or essential transport costs would be counted as a decline in well being using basic needs indicators, while per capita GNP would record this as an increase.
The human capability approach to poverty measurement attempts to measure poverty in terms of outcomes or “ends.” This approach defines the phenomena as the absence of basic human capabilities to function at a minimally acceptable level within a society. An emphasis is placed on people’s abilities and opportunities to enjoy long, healthy lives, to be literate and to participate freely in their society.
While Americans are worried about dips in their 401Ks, Asians are increasingly worried about more important things, like feeding their families, as the global recession continues to play out.
The last couple of boom decades had done a lot to decrease poverty in Asia — since 1990, the percentage of the population living on a dollar a day had decreased from an incredible 55 percent, to less than 10 percent. That means that the number of desperately poor went from nearly 900 million, to fewer than 200. This is largely off the back of China’s rise. Btw, I’ve interviewed a number of officials and economists within China that feel that their nation should receive a Nobel Prize for alleviating poverty. No joke.
Anyway, all this is good news, because unlike in past crises, Asia is starting from a much richer base. That said, poverty estimates are rising much faster than officials thought they would. The World Bank expects that about 53 million fewer people in Asia can expect to rise out of poverty than before the crisis began. And there will be an even more significant future knock-on effect, because lots of those people will pull their children out of school, or not feed their families adequately (childhood malnutrition can wreak havoc on the economic future of a nation – just witness the difference in health and productive capacity of the populations in North and South Korea).
There are also danger factors now that didn’t exist during, say, the Asian financial crisis. Back then, lots of extremely poor city dwellers simply moved back to their rural homelands, living off the land until jobs returned. Now, thanks to massive Asian urbanization, that’s harder to do. So far, countries seem to be managing all the social upheaval, but it’s going to be interesting to see what the political fallout of all this will be. As I’ll cover in another post, history shows us that the bigger the economic crisis, the bigger the political changes in store for the world.
Current crisis in Pakistan are taking to further down the poverty line as more and more people are migrating from north areas to Punjab and Sind where industry is shutting down due to shortage in supply and people are struggling to get 2 times meals. The situation in villages is more worse due to less job rates.
What Government is planning to end the poverty in Pakistan, readers are welcome to write down?
Abstracts from http://blog.newsweek.com/ and http://ivythesis.typepad.com/

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

New law should ban picking baby’s sex by abortion

May 26th, 2009

In most of the Asian nations, sons are preferred over daughters. Couples try to know about the sex of coming baby before its birth by ultrasound and if it reveals that their unborn child is a girl, the woman tries to have abortion.
In many countries, parents are allowed to create genetically designed babies, including self-selection of the child’s sex and there is legislation that can restrict this practice and require reporting of the abortions that are occurring.
According to the Boston Globe, a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that examined the ratio of boys to girls born to Asian-American families in the U.S. demonstrated couples that welcome an oldest daughter become increasingly likely to abort future daughters to get the son they seek.
This practice is not in Asian Countries but even in developed countries, males are favoured over females and all over the world, millions of females are missing due to sex selection abortions. A research made in USA by Poll that showed 86 percent of Americans believe sex-selective abortions should be illegal, the paper pointed out that they’re not.
In Pakistan, what are statistics of such type of abortion, but it is there and authorities should consider its legality.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Justice May Be Blind and Behind the Chair…..

May 23rd, 2009

So it’s hot here in Pakistan, Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and other suspended judges are now on their chairs, enjoying the air conditioners while who were protesting on roads for their restoration in the winter season are now protesting for electricity, protest is on its way of routine but with a different face, and it will take another year like the “Save Judicial, Save Pakistan” movement to “Give us Electricity, save our economy”.

The Judges are in routine of their business and some typical cases are there for decision which may revert the old rulings because the element in their restoration are still behind the chair who are indirectly asking their reward now to save their future.

“In notes of proceedings of Wong Hua Seh v Abang Mohd. Porkan bin Haji Abang Budiman & Ding Kuong Hing on 24 June 12008 reproducing a part of it (unedited), Justice Datuk Ian Chin lashed out at the “serving judge” mentioned in the News Straits Times report on 11 June 2008 and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad: On the “serving judge” “I can think of one reason and I can think of one judge (who is still serving) who will do that. This takes me back to 1996 or some other year, where Dr Mahathir had another group picture taken with the judges. To my disgust, this judge quickly planted himself behind the chair where Dr. Mahathir was to sit and when Dr Mahathir was about to be seated this judge declared: “Sir, I am always behind you.” It was disgusting even as a joke as it reduced the dignity of the office of a judge since the statement panders for endearment to Dr Mahathir. Since then I have always pondered whether this judge really meant what that statement would ordinarily convey which is that he will forever support Dr. Mahathir and to mean also, since it was made by a judge, he will decide what he thinks what Dr. Mahathir would like the verdict to be and worse still when told to.”

Now the test of impartiality those judges who were suspended by Musharaf Government have started and public will judge who is behind the chair while giving any award in the case of Sharif Brothers?

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Who ruined the Beauty of Swat?

May 17th, 2009

Swat is known as the Switzerland of Pakistan. It is on of the most green valleys of the Northern Pakistan, well connected to the rest of Pakistan and located in the middle of foothills of Hindukush mountain range. It is a place for leisure Lover, Hikers, and archaeologist. The Swat is garden of Ashoka and was a prosperous land in the Buddhist times (2nd BC to 5 AD) There are at least over 100 archaeological sites in the valley less then 10% of them are excavated. One can explore some of those sites in a half day tour of Swat.

Swat was a princely state till July 28, 1969. The Islamic state of Swat was established in 1849 by Sayyed Akbar Shah. The state of Swat was kept in abeyance from 1863 to 1926, but Sharia law prevailed through Qazi courts during this period. The courts were restored by the British in 1926. Qazi courts operated till 1969 when Swat finally became part of Pakistan.
Residents of Swat think it was easy to get justice before 1969 through the Qazi courts, but after the imposition of Pakistani law, the poor do not get justice. The Taliban have exploited the delay in justice and instigated the poor to rise against big landlords, banning female education and blowing up schools to the hanging of decapitated bodies in Mingora. (the valley’s main town, the reign of terror spearheaded by Maulana Fazalullah, a radical cleric, defies description)
Swat today is a decidedly no-go area. Even Haji Adeel, a senator and senior leader of the Awami National Party, which heads the ruling coalition in the North-West Frontier province, pointed to the valley’s dire security situation.
He said: “Swat is a part of Pakistan but no governor, chief minister or the prime minister can venture to go there.”
The Pakistan army says armed groups have so far blown up or torched 165 schools for girls, 80 video shops, 22 barber shops and destroyed 20 bridges.
A devastating after-effect of the insurgency is that an estimated one million children in the Frontier province, which includes Swat, may have missed anti-polio vaccinations after the government exempted from its immunisation drive various settled areas it deemed too dangerous.
Fazalullah’s attempted to enforce Islamic Sharia and an ongoing military operation launched by Pervez Musharraf, the former president, in 2007 forced nearly a third of Swat’s 1.5 million people to migrate out of the province.
Taking advantage of the government’s deep engagement in the “war on terror” and Musharraf’s own protracted battle for survival in 2007, Fazalullah’s 10,000-strong private army established control over 5,337 square kilometres of territory.
The radical cleric used FM radio to pass on his decrees to the local population. So effective was his grip on the valley, that the government’s influence was now largely confined to just 36 square kilometres of territory in and around Mingora.
Fazalullah ran a self-styled judiciary, which heard cases and handed down verdicts. His feared – and well-equipped – rebel army reportedly takes its cue from Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, an extremist organisation headed by Baitullah Masud, the commander suspected of authoring the assassination of Benazir Bhutto, a former prime minister, in 2007.
The two came together in the aftermath of a sweeping military operation in 2007 at the Red Mosque in Islamabad who had defied the Musharraf regime for months causing a threat to avenge the killings of Lal Mosque and an alliance which is said to be responsible for suicide bombings that killed dozens of security personals later on.

Scene from Hell where Security forces were forced to take an action
Zubair Torwali, a social activist who lives in Swat, says the security forces fear patrolling the Swat valley.
“The police are escorted by the army personnel and come out of their hideouts for a couple of hours,” he said.
“One of the busiest squares, Grain Chowk, was renamed by shopkeepers as Khooni (bloody) Chowk because when they come to their shops in the morning, they find four or five bodies hung over the poles or trees. The bodies are usually headless.”
A more chilling account of the prevailing fear is provided by Hamid Mir, a talk show host with Geo TV; Mir earned fame for his interview with Osama bin Laden in 2001.
Mir describes an episode in which a widow, who taught at a private school in Mingora, was warned by the extremists to stop coming out of her house, let alone teach.
Having no other means to feed her three children, she begged a religious scholar to intercede with the extremists, one of whom was a former student of the scholar.
However, the commander of the extremists was so annoyed that he had the scholar arrested immediately, before banishing him from Mingora.
Days later, the widow was executed by the extremists after being declared a prostitute.
At least three journalists – Sirajuddin, Azizuddin and Qari Shoaib – have also been killed while a sister of another, Sherinzada, perished in an attack on his house.
However, two other journalists, Hameedullah Khan and Musa Khankhel, have braved death to report on events in Swat.
Khan had his house dynamited by the local Taliban earlier this month and Khankhel has escaped two assassination attempts.
Khankhel has managed to earn the ire of both the security agencies and the extremists for his reporting.

A mission which is impossible without economic development

Syed Allauddin, a ruling Pakistan People’s Party MP from Swat who is unable to return to the region, believes there may be a three-pronged solution to the violence.
He suggests that Sharia be officially implemented followed by economic development and creation of job opportunities.
“But if I cannot enter my area how can I help my voters?” he said.
Caught between an indifferent government and ineffective army on the one hand and the extremists on the other, the people of Swat are, similarly, at a loss.
“The predicament of the people of Swat is worse than even of the people of Gaza. In Gaza, the enemy was well known but in Swat, the people don’t know who the enemy is and whom to hold responsible,” said Torwali.
The lack of faith is understandable, said Nasim Zehra, a security analyst based in Islamabad.
“Clearly, people in Swat have zero faith in the institutions of their own country. Can we blame them?”

Government of Pakistan writ
The Pakistani government, desperate to restore peace to a Taliban-infested valley once known as the “Switzerland of Pakistan,” agreed after discussion with its allies to enforce strict Islamic law in the surrounding district near the Afghan border, conceding to a long-standing demand by local Islamist leaders who in turn pledged to ask the fighters to lay down their arms.
In announcing the agreement, Pakistani officials asserted that the adoption of sharia law would bring swift and fair justice to the Swat Valley, where people have long complained of legal corruption and delays. They said the new system would have “nothing in common” with the draconian rule of the Taliban militia that ran Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, during which thieves’ hands were amputated and adulterers were stoned to death.
“There was a vacuum . . . in the legal system. The people demanded this and they deserve it,” said Amir Haider Khan Hoti, chief minister of the North-West Frontier Province. The new system will include an appeals process, something the Afghan Taliban justice system did not allow for.
Militant leaders in the scenic Swat Valley, in a gesture of good faith, said they would observe a 10-day cease-fire while the new system is implemented. The Pakistani army said it would suspend operations in the area, and there were anecdotal reports of celebratory gunfire and of crowds returning to once-deserted streets.
But deals with Islamist groups in Pakistan have a history of failure, and this one has several weaknesses. It was not signed by any Swat insurgents but by an older insurgent leader, Sufi Mohammad, who must now persuade the younger and more firebrand fighters to disarm. Mohammad led an armed uprising in Swat in 1994 to bring in sharia rule, but it failed and he was imprisoned for several years, allowing his more radical son-in-law to take over the movement.

Current Situation in Swat and other districts
Military officials said they were giving people in at least three districts seven hours to leave ahead of planned strikes against Taliban hideouts.
Hundreds of thousands of people left Swat in the past week to escape an escalation of fighting between government security forces and Taliban militants.
The army says 12,000 to 15,000 troops in Swat face 4,000 to 5,000 militants, including small numbers of foreigners and hardened fighters from the South Waziristan tribal region.
The latest exodus, mostly affecting residents in the towns of Mingora, Kambar and Raheemabad, was made more difficult because the military refused to allow privately owned vehicles to enter the valley, forcing some to leave on foot or with donkey-pulled carts.
Many tried to take as many belongings as they could with them, including livestock.
“What we’re seeing is suffering on a massive scale, and it’s just getting worse,” said Jeff Hall, an aid worker for World Vision in Pakistan.
As many as one million people have been displaced by the conflict since August, according the United Nations’ refugee agency.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres said the agency had registered more than 1.17 million displaced persons since May 2. They are in addition to nearly 550,000 others who fled fighting in the northwest region last year.
A top army officer linked with the operation in Swat said the “situation in Swat is much more complicated than East Bengal in 1971 where we were fighting against Indian-sponsored secular insurgents. The local population in East Bengal was fully supporting the insurgents, but the ground reality of Swat is very different. We are fighting the Taliban and they are demanding the enforcement of Islamic law in Swat and all the local political leaders are supporting this demand under public pressure.”
Security forces backed by artillery, attack helicopters and jet aircraft announced “a full-scale operation” last week to eliminate up to 5,000 Taliban fighters deeply entrenched in both wooded hamlets and populous towns of Swat, 140 km from Islamabad.
The army claims to have killed more than 950 rebels while losing only 48 soldiers. Those figures could not be verified independently.
Although the military has denied causing civilian casualties, scores are believed to have died in crossfire, or by roadside bombs planted by the rebels.
Taliban fighters are also reportedly trying to flee the combat zone disguised as locals after shaving off beards and cutting locks of hair.

What will be the end?
The question is what will be the end of this war, the war in the same country with its own citizens having different ideology of Islam. Who s supporting these people with arms and weapons? The intelligence agencies should find the master mind behind these peoples and if Afghanistan or India is supporting these people then Government should ask its friends and International Community for help to stop this violence and back. If this support is just like Kasmiri Mujahideen in Indian part of Kashmir, then no doubt, this is a revenge of Indian Government against Pakistan.
Pakistan have left its support to Mujahideen in Kashmir and now there is peace in Indian part of Kashmir because Pakistani forces are busy in war with its own citizen just like Indian Government in the past, then India should consider that this policy of both countries will destroy the peace of this area and both nations will never be in peace and harmony.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Pakistan: warning that a poor attitude towards Pakistan can damage the UK

April 30th, 2009

IAS Chief Executive tells a Parliamentary Group that treating Pakistani students badly could rebound on Britain’s interests
Speaking in Committee Room 15, House of Commons on the afternoon of Tuesday 28 April with HE Wajid Shamsul Hasan the High Commissioner for Pakistan, Lord Nazir Ahmed of Rotherham, Mohammad Sarwar MP and other leading British Pakistanis at a meeting entitled “Justice for Pakistani Students” organised by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Third World Solidarity chaired by Councillor Mushtaq Lasharie, Keith Best, Chief Executive of IAS, said that the value of Pakistani students to the UK is great and should not be jeopardised.
“Over 10,000 students come to the UK every year from Pakistan and contribute about £100m in their fees and value to the British economy. When they return they act as informal ambassadors for Britain if their time here has been productive and they have been welcomed. Yet security issues, the recession, elements of xenophobia and the increasing attention to the highly politicised subject of immigration as we approach a general election mean that often their experience is not a happy one. Any bad experience can damage the desire of other students to come here when, overall, they contribute more than £8.5m to the British economy every year.
“For the last full year for which figures are available there were more than 28,000 applications by students from Pakistan but only 11,500 were granted – meaning that almost 18,000 were refused: a refusal rate of 64%. Although we have won many of those cases on appeal this is no longer an option. Sadly, many students are refused because they have put themselves into the hands of unscrupulous travel agents or advisers who suggest that they make fraudulent applications or sell them forged education certificates. This will mean an automatic refusal and probably a ban on coming to the UK as well as being passed over to the local police for prosecution. The reason IAS has set up its own offices in Karachi, Lahore and Mirpur is because we wanted to offer Pakistanis who wish to come to the UK a competent and honest service and help with applications. Under the new Points Based System for students (Tier 4) there is no longer a right of appeal against a refusal which means that the application must be perfect.
“It is inappropriate to comment on the ten Pakistani students who were arrested on alleged terrorism charges save that if there is substance to the allegations against them they should be charged and face trial. It would be a denial of justice and cause damage to the UK’s reputation abroad if they are deported without substantive allegations being proved (in such circumstances they would also face a ten year ban from returning to the UK). ”

Contents of email which I received today from IAS.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Zardari for solving agriculture issues on war footing

April 11th, 2009

Recently in blogs on this website, we urged to the Government of Pakistan to work for Agriculture base industries and products and we are happy that Present Zardari have stressed the government official to work on emergency basis as country can meet its food requirements with proper use of available technologies

“The development of the food and agriculture sectors is important for social and political stability of the country, President Asif Ali Zardari said on Monday.

“If harnessed properly with the aid of latest technologies, Pakistan could not only meet its own food requirements but also become a net exporter of grain and commodities and earn foreign exchange and produce indigenous fuel. The technology to boost agriculture and food production was available in the country and a lot could be learnt from the Chinese model to increase food and agriculture production, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

The president also advised the government to consider the possibility of enhancing the food grains storage capacity through a partnership between the private and public sectors. He said the private sector could build an additional storage capacity while the public sector guaranteed to rent out the storage space built by the private sector.

The president also advised the government to consider special projects for the upgradation of ginning factories with a focus on meeting their power requirements.

We hope Mr Zardari will establish a think tank for agriculture boost up and to look after the issues of small farmers and shortage of urea in the country, too.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

World Bank Calls for Renewed Emphasis on Agriculture for Development

April 10th, 2009

The World Development Report issued in October 2007 calls for greater investment in agriculture in developing countries and warns that the sector must be placed at the center of the development agenda if the goals of halving extreme poverty and hunger by 2015 are to be realized.

Titled ‘Agriculture for Development’, the report says the agricultural and rural sectors have suffered from neglect and underinvestment over the past 20 years. While 75 percent of the world’s poor live in rural areas, a mere 4 percent of official development assistance goes to agriculture in developing countries. In Sub-Saharan Africa, a region heavily reliant on agriculture for overall growth, public spending for farming is also only 4 percent of total government spending and the sector is still taxed at relatively high levels.

According to the report, agriculture can offer pathways out of poverty if efforts are made to increase productivity in the staple foods sector; connect smallholders to rapidly expanding high-value horticulture, poultry, aquaculture, as well as dairy markets; and generate jobs in the rural nonfarm economy.

Agriculture consumes 85 percent of the world’s utilized water and the sector contributes to deforestation, land degradation, and pollution. The report recommends measures to achieve more sustainable production systems and outlines incentives to protect the environment.

If we have a look over agriculture progress in Pakistan, it is clear not a single government of Pakistan now and in the past have considered this sector for due progress. Claims are made but on site it is zero. The situation is that we, being a agricultural country, are importing agricultural products from neighbor countries.

The policies of government are only up to papers. Being a member of farmer family, I know how a poor farmer is living hand to mouth in these days. Prices of Urea , diesel and electricity have gone up. There is shortage of water for lands. If there is no rain in time, then a shortage in yield do not cover the expenses. So many issues and problems in agriculture sector are there. Dairy and livestock development issues are there but no proper planning is there to support a lay farmer.

The authorities should make policies not in the offices but on site listening the farmers. And most important is to construct the new resources to supply the water in time to farmers.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Tehrik-i-Taliban: A Specious Claim and Brash Threats

April 9th, 2009

By Fred Burton and Scott Stewart

When we wrote our Global Security and Intelligence Report last week on Baitullah Mehsud and the Manawan attack, we had no intention that the piece would be part of a series, but several developments over the past week have compelled us to once again write about Pakistan — and Mehsud and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in particular.

First, on April 4, eight paramilitary police were killed in a suicide bombing against their camp in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. This attack was the second suicide bombing in Islamabad in less than two weeks, and followed closely on the heels of the March 23 attack on the headquarters of the Police Special Branch in Islamabad. After the April 4 attack, one of Baitullah Mehsud’s deputies, Hakimullah Mehsud (who, like Baitullah, is a member of the large Mehsud clan) contacted the press to claim credit for the attack and threatened that the group would carry out two suicide attacks per week in Pakistan. According to press reports, Hakimullah Mehsud said: “We have shown enough restraint, previously, we were striking once in three months, but from now onward we will go for at least two suicide attacks a week.”

On April 5, a suicide bomber attacked a Shiite mosque in Chakwal, a Punjab city located approximately 50 miles southeast of Islamabad. The attack killed at least 22 people and injured another 35. About 2,000 people had gathered at the mosque for Majlis Aza, an annual Shiite celebration. The bomber reportedly detonated himself when guards stopped him in the crowd at the mosque’s front gate.

Umar Farooq, the spokesman of the shadowy militant organization Fedayeen al-Islam (FI), called The Associated Press the same day to claim credit for the Chakwal attack. Farooq said his group staged the attack on the mosque as part of a “campaign against infidels.”

Oddly, on April 4, Baitullah Mehsud (or someone claiming to be him) called Reuters to claim responsibility for the April 3 shooting at a U.S. immigration center in Binghamton, New York. “They were my men,” the caller told the AP. “I gave them orders in reaction to U.S. drone attacks.” This claim was quickly discounted by eyewitness accounts of the shooting. According to surviving victims and other witnesses, the Binghamton shooting was carried out by a lone gunman, Jiverly Voong, who was a Vietnamese immigrant with no apparent links to Islam or the Taliban.
Background on Mehsud

Before plunging into the Binghamton claims and threats to attack the continental United States, let’s take a quick look at the man behind them, Baitullah Mehsud. As STRATFOR has previously discussed, Mehsud, who is only in his mid-30s, is a member of a new generation of militant leaders in Pakistan’s tribal badlands. As part of this new generation, Mehsud has endeavored to systematically remove or undermine the established tribal leaders in South Waziristan, usurping power and thus severing many of the tools of influence the Pakistani government held in the region. This process of killing off the old tribal leadership has been a significant contributing factor to what we have previously referred to as the “Talibanization” of Pakistan. In some ways, Mehsud personifies the struggle between al Qaeda and Pakistani intelligence organizations for influence and control of Afghan and Pakistani jihadists.

Since Mehsud operates largely outside of its control, the government of Pakistan has come to view Mehsud (and others like him) as a larger threat to Pakistan than the Afghan Taliban or the foreign jihadists — like al Qaeda — that Mehsud considers allies. Indeed, Pakistan has long tried to play up the importance of Mehsud to the United States and has been quite agitated that, until relatively recently, the United States was not targeting Mehsud’s TTP organization. When the United States finally did turn its sights on Meshud and his network, the TTP responded by launching attacks against the Pakistani authorities. Indeed, Hakimullah Mehsud said the group was stepping up the tempo of their attacks precisely because of the U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) attacks directed against the TTP.

As we noted last week, although Baitullah Mehsud tells journalists that he is ready to be martyred, the UAV attacks against the TTP do pose a very real threat to him, and to the viability of his organization. The scope of this threat is made evident by their response to the attacks.

However, there is also another dynamic that threatens the TTP, and that is the efforts of the Pakistanis and the Americans to try to split the nationalist militants from those who are more internationally focused. That is, split those groups who want to carry out jihad to create a transnational caliphate (like al Qaeda) from those groups whose primary interest is establishing more localized control — like the Taliban in Afghanistan prior to the U.S. invasion. This approach is very similar to the approach coalition forces took in Iraq to separate al Qaeda in Iraq from the more nationalistic Sunni tribal militants in places like Anbar province.

While the United States is attempting to divide the jihadists on the Afghan side of the border, the Pakistanis are attempting to do the same among those in Pakistan. If the Pakistanis and Americans are able to split the more nationalist jihadists (like the Haqqani network) away from the more internationalist jihadists (like al Qaeda and the TTP) this could leave al Qaeda and the TTP isolated and far more vulnerable — which is why this process is seen as a threat by Mehsud and company. Indeed, divisions already exist with groups like the Haqqani network, which opposes attacks inside Pakistan.
Claims and Threats

Into this mix, Mehsud has injected threats to hit the United States and has made the strange claim of credit for the Binghamton shooting. Let’s examine the Binghamton claim first. We were quite surprised — and a bit embarrassed — to see this claim come out only a couple of days after we wrote in our security weekly that a prominent militant leader like Mehsud did not have to take credit for other people’s attacks, and that lying about such things would hurt his already well-established reputation.

Initially, we thought that perhaps the claim was some sort of psychological operation by the Pakistanis or Americans designed to make Mehsud look like a fool or a nut. However, when days passed and the TTP issued no retraction, it became apparent that Mehsud had actually made the claim for some reason. Also, despite his carefully crafted public image of never displaying his face, Mehsud is a media animal, who, as his frequent calls to Reuters, The Associated Press and Pakistani journalists testify, loves to see his name in print. With all the coverage surrounding the Binghamton claim, he undoubtedly was aware of the event. Had the claim been orchestrated by an intelligence agency seeking to discredit him, he would have quickly denied it — just as he quickly denied the claims that he was behind the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.

As to the threat to attack the United States, one must use a two-step test: 1) Does the actor behind the threat possess the capability to carry out the threatened action? and 2) Does the actor possess the intent to do so? When we look at the capabilities of the TTP, the group has not demonstrated the ability to operate as a transnational organization. We have seen instances of grassroots-type jihadists elsewhere who were allegedly trained at TTP camps, but providing paramilitary training to grassroots jihadists is different from actually training and dispatching operatives to conduct attacks on your behalf.

The technical skills and tradecraft required to conduct an act of terrorism are very different from those needed to be an insurgent, and are very different from the subjects taught in basic military — or paramilitary — training. Even if the grassroots operatives are trained in some of the more technical skills of terrorism such as bomb-making, there are still important tradecraft skills that must be acquired and honed before a person can become a successful transnational militant capable of conducting acts of terrorism in a hostile environment. We define terrorist tradecraft as the set of subtle skills needed to maintain secrecy and operate within a hostile environment. These skills are foundational to the success of both the individual jihadist and his network anywhere, but they are acutely critical while conducting transnational operations.

Merely being able to travel internationally with ease is something many guerrilla fighters cannot do. More refined tasks, such as conducting preoperational surveillance in a major metropolitan area, maintaining secure communications, establishing cover for status and cover for action while undertaking operational activity, or acquiring weapons without arousing unwanted attention, are simply things not taught to most guerrilla fighters, and they are skills that require a great deal of practical training in order to master.

So far, the TTP has shown an ability to successfully operate inside Pakistan and Afghanistan, but its operations to date have been somewhat rudimentary (like the Marawan attack) and have not shown an advanced degree of nuance or sophistication. Likewise, the group has not demonstrated the ability to train and dispatch operatives to a major western city like New York or London in order to conduct an attack. (Al Qaeda has demonstrated this ability but the TTP has not.) When all is said and done, employing an improvised explosive device manufactured at a camp in Pakistan against a target in Pakistan is a far cry from employing it against a target in London.

Now, with regard to the second step of the test — intent. Is the TTP really planning to strike Washington, D.C., New York and London? This is a question that almost every major intelligence and law enforcement agency in the West began to focus on following Mehsud’s public statements in a January 2008 interview with Al Jazeera that he wanted to attack the United States and the United Kingdom. “We pray to God to give us the ability to destroy the White House, New York and London,” Mehsud said during the interview. “And we have trust in God. Very soon, we will be witnessing jihad’s miracles.”

But does such a public statement — or even his March 31 statement in which he threatened strikes against Washington, D.C. in response to U.S. UAV attacks — really translate into intent? This is where the intent side of the equation gets very fuzzy. Merely stating that one is going to do something is not necessarily a clear indication that there is real intent to do so.

Indeed, there is a good argument to be made that if Mehsud truly intended to strike the United States or United Kingdom he would remain silent about his aspirations in order to help ensure the operational security of any operatives he has dispatched abroad to conduct such strikes. Certainly, Osama bin Laden did openly declare war against the United States in August 1996 and again in February 1998, but he never mentioned specific targets in those declarations and was certainly far more circumspect with his statements as his operatives got closer to actually executing attacks. In fact, bin Laden even went so far as to deny responsibility for many of the early al Qaeda attacks and initially denied responsibility for the 9/11 attacks.
Calculations

Mehsud is neither stupid nor crazy. Such people do not become major militant leaders at age 35 in the violent world of Pakistan’s tribal areas. He is clearly rational and quite Machiavellian. What he is doing, therefore, likely has some rational explanation beyond the fact that he likes to hear his name mentioned by the media. While the threats against the United States and United Kingdom may be explained away under the “media debutante” rationale, unless Mehsud made a terrible miscalculation in taking credit for the Binghamton shooting, there must be some other overriding reason to risk damaging his reputation as a militant leader with a specious claim.

As seen by the U.S. reaction to the 9/11 attacks, any successful large-scale attack on American soil could have dire consequences for Mehsud. Such a strike could, at the very least, serve to steel U.S. resolve to stay in Afghanistan, or it could motivate the United States to dramatically increase its focus on totally destroying the TTP. Additionally, if Mehsud is truly intent on hitting the United States or United Kingdom, we should see him begin to hit American and British targets within his current operational sphere, i.e., within Pakistan, before graduating to American and British targets overseas.

There is another possibility. Perhaps Mehsud does not possess the intent to attack Washington, New York or London. Maybe his threats — along with the Binghamton claim — are intended to scuttle the emerging U.S. strategy of dealing with factions of the Taliban in an effort to divide them and isolate the more radical elements.

If Mehsud does fear such a strategy — and he has reason to, following its successes in Iraq — it is possible that his recent antics are an effort to influence public perception inside the United States regarding the Taliban. As the United States reaches out to factions of the Afghan Taliban in an attempt to split them from al Qaeda, et al., Mehsud threatens the United States and attempts to link the Pakistani Taliban to a shooting in Binghamton, New York. Even though the link to the shooting was quickly and officially discounted, it is a safe bet that it will live on for a long time as an urban legend or rumor, especially among the more conspiracy-minded. Such perceptions are going to make the strategy of negotiating with any Taliban (Afghan or Pakistani) appear to be less tenable for many Americans.

At the same time, Mehsud could be using his rhetoric in an attempt to steer the more nationalist jihadists in Pakistan and Afghanistan toward his more transnational agenda. In any case, Mehsud’s efforts to shape opinion at home or abroad could explain his recent posturing, however bogus or brash it might be.
Source: www.stratfor.com

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Facing Reality

April 7th, 2009

We are quoting comments published in English news paper of Pakistan “The News” which reflects the reality of suicide bombing and its causes.
“The suicide blast outside an Imambargah in Chakwal on April 5, killing 22 and adding to the rising toll extracted by sectarian violence, is another terrible atrocity we find ourselves subjected to. What is though a positive development is the admission by the adviser on interior that the bombing and other recent terrorist attacks, including that on a police check post in Islamabad that killed eight FC personnel, are the work of Pakistanis. It is not clear how, why or when this light has suddenly dawned on the man responsible for safeguarding our security, but certainly it makes a change from the past tendency to immediately point fingers in the direction of neighbouring countries.

We all know that most, if not all of these, are carried out by young Pakistanis. In some cases at least these teenagers are as much the victims as the hapless people whose families live forever with the grief of a life so aimlessly lost. But the key fact is that it is Pakistanis, citizens who may at their schools have sung the national anthem or, like many of us, waved green and white flags on key occasions, who are behind the wave of terrorism that has overtaken us. The sectarian conflict that Chakwal never knew has taken a hold there. This is the doing of our own people. Cover-ups and a refusal to face what is happening to our country will take us nowhere. We must hope the interior advisor’s admission can lead to action to deal with the elements who have set up base everywhere in the country and today threaten its very survival.”

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Judicial Murder of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto

April 4th, 2009

Today, it is the anniversary of Ex Prime Minister of Pakistan Mr Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and people have gathered on his tomb in Larkana to salute him pray for his soul and his daughter Ex Prime Minister Benazeer Bhutto who was also assassinated in the name of restoration of democracy in Pakistan. When Zufiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged on April 4, 1977, I was a student and I remember all the situation in my mind what happened and how he was hanged. He was a great leader who worked for Pakistan and I often say when someone remember him that “He gave the voice (tongue to speak) to poor people to raise their voice for their rights”.

And no doubt, after his regime people learned how to come on roads and how to struggle for their rights.

His hanging was a judicial murder and preplanned by Ex President General Zia-ul-Haq. He was hanged under sec. 109 PC on false evidence of some officials in the murder of Mr. Kasoori who was his opponent in politics.

Now and even after his hanging, it was protested all over the world that it was a judicial murder but not a single government even Benazeer Butto’s own government had any enquiry in this regard or set up any commission to know the facts. It may be the judges of that bench in Supreme Court who confirmed the hanging are alive, can disclose the facts and tell the nation why they were forced to confirm the decision of Lahore High Court. They should come in front of people and tell the truth. Media who was crying on the reinstatement of Chief Justice Mr. Iftikhar Chaoudhry should disclose the facts too on his judicial murder and ask the people and judges to come forward and unveil the secrets. Mr Chief Justice Iftikhar Ali Choudhry who is known as a Honest Judge, if he has courage, can set up a Bench and investigate this Judicial Murder on Sue Moto Notice.

Can we expect this one from Mr. Chief Justice Iftikhar Ali Choudhary?

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Police under terror attack in Pakistan and future measures

March 30th, 2009

The Global terrorism have become so cheap that it is common now in developing countries where resources of security measures have made it easy especially where the weakness of political system encourage terrors to do their activities with a little manpower capturing the world’s attention and gives the weak, the ability to terrify the strong. Is there any way to beat it? Here Bjorn Lomborg sets out some of the cost problems – and offers some possible solutions.
The material cost of a suicide bombing is as low as US$150. This modest investment will result in an average of 12 deaths and spread fear throughout the targeted population.
The developed world is responding to the threat of fundamentalist Islamic terrorism by building ever-bigger, ever-better fortifications around key targets

In such scenario if governments take any actions to guard one venue simply prompt the terrorists to shift to another target. Terrorists enjoy strategic advantages over the nations they attack and can hide among the general population and are difficult to identify.

What happened in Pakistan, today March 30th, 2009 in a police training institute, martyring 25 persons in attack, injuring 92, martyring 8 in the operation and killing 4 terrorists showing the negligence of government agencies and lack of securities measures?

The author have gathered some security measures to be taken in future from different sources for the authorities who are responsible for the safety of people and maintenance of peace in the country.

What can be Done?
Unlike other global challenges, attempts to combat terrorism can have significant unintended negative consequences. Strong offensive measures against terrorists can lead to backlash attacks as new grievances are created, whereas cooperating with their demands creates an incentive for others to mimic their tactics.

To be effective, counter terrorism measures must either make all modes of attack more difficult or reduce terrorists’ resources making some targets ‘harder’ simply encourages terrorists to shift their focus. Terrorists can observe how governments change potential targets and then attack accordingly.

For now, we need to rely on our government and the World experts to resolve this issue. Meanwhile, we can learn to be patient and be a little more tolerant of the increased security measures until the terrorism issues are resolved or the risk of future harm is reduced.

A terrorist group can, at times, be annihilated, but new groups will surface. Actions to kill a group’s leaders may result in more ruthless leaders replacing them, as Israel discovered with Black September and Hamas.
Terrorist attacks will always remain an obvious and cheap investment for groups who seek to spread panic and alarm.

On a wider international perspective, increased cooperation is difficult due to nations jealously guarding their sovereignty over police and security matters. Cooperation only works if it is comprehensive. If all but a single country denies terrorists a safe haven on their soil, the one holdout undercuts the efforts of the others.

We should consider that in future, terrorist can attacks upon schools in large cities with the terrorists’ goals of creating fear.”

School and public safety officials nationwide now proactively pursue prevention programs, security measures, and emergency preparedness measures to prevent a future Columbine-like attack in their schools. The failure to talk about the possibility of such an incident occurring and the failure to take steps to prevent such an occurrence would be considered as “negligence” in the eyes of most educators, public safety officials, parents, media, and courts. In this regard encouragement to school personnel to maintain a “heightened awareness” for suspicious activity and to report same will be a basic factor in security measures taken by the government. This may include suspicious vehicles on and around campus, suspicious persons in and around school buildings including those taking photographs or videotaping, suspicious packages around the building perimeter and/or in the school, and suspicious information seeking efforts by phone or by unknown “visitors.”
Reduce the number of doors accessible from the outside to one designated entrance. Stress the importance of staff greeting and challenging strangers, and reporting suspicious individuals. Review security procedures for after-school and evening activities and building use. Utilize security technology and devices for monitoring and controlling interior facility access as defined by professional security assessments. All other measures which are considered in this way should be counted for and be discussed with school authorities.

Suggested Anti-terrorism Security Measures
This message provides suggested random anti-terrorism security measures. Although we do not have specific targeting information, the sequential release of recent statements by key al Qa’ida members, strengthens previous assessments that al Qa’ida continues to plan for major attacks.

Little or No Cost Actions:
• Form a new force to tackle the terror attacks with latest technology and arms.
• Control the chemicals used in arms and making bombs by terrorists and importers are bound to have a record of their customers.
• Check and have a record of all workshops, industries which make parts or instruments used in any machinery or supplies.
• Control the import or sale of steel in FATA and manufacturing of arms at local level.
• Maintain situational awareness of world events and ongoing threats.
• Ensure all levels of personnel are notified via briefings, e-mail, voice mail and signage of any changes in threat conditions and protective measures.
• Encourage personnel to be alert and immediately report any situation that may constitute a threat or suspicious activity.
• Post emergency telephone numbers for police, fire, and rescue. Encourage personnel to memorize important numbers.
• Know the location of the closest police stations, hospitals, schools, etc.
• Encourage personnel to avoid routines, vary times and routes, pre-plan, and keep a low profile, especially during periods of high threat.
• Encourage personnel to take notice and report suspicious packages, devices, unattended briefcases, or other unusual materials immediately; inform them not to handle or attempt to remove any such object.
• Take any threatening or malicious telephone call, facsimile, or bomb threat seriously. If such a call is received, obtain and record as much information as possible to assist in identification of the caller. Record the time of the call, the exact words, any distinguishing features of the caller, and any background noise. Develop bomb threat information forms to assist if not already in place.
• Encourage personnel to keep their family members and supervisors apprised of their whereabouts.
• Encourage personnel to know emergency exits and stairwells.
• Increase the number of visible security personnel wherever possible.
• Rearrange exterior vehicle barriers, traffic cones, and road blocks to alter traffic patterns near facilities and cover by alert security forces.
• Institute/increase vehicle, foot and roving security patrols varying in size, timing and routes.
• Implement random security guard shift changes.
• Arrange for law enforcement vehicles to be parked randomly near entrances and exits.
• Review current contingency plans and if not already in place, develop and implement procedures for receiving and acting on threat information, alert notification procedures, terrorist incident response procedures, evacuation procedures, bomb threat procedures, hostage and barricade procedures, chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) procedures, consequence and crisis management procedures, accountability procedures, and media procedures.
• When the aforementioned plans and procedures have been implemented, conduct internal training exercises and invite local emergency responders (fire, rescue, medical and bomb squads) to participate in joint exercises.
• Coordinate and establish partnerships with local authorities to develop intelligence and information sharing relationships.
• Place personnel on standby for contingency planning.
• Limit the number of access points and strictly enforce access control procedures.
• Implement stringent identification procedures to include conducting 100% “hands on” checks of security badges for all personnel, if badges are required.
• Remind personnel to properly display badges, if applicable, and enforce visibility.
• Require two forms of photo identification for all visitors.
• Escort all visitors entering and departing.
• X-ray all packages, if possible, prior to entry, and inspect all handbags, and briefcases.
• Validate vendor lists of all routine emergency deliveries and repair services.
• Approach all illegally parked vehicles in and around facilities, question drivers and direct them to move immediately, if owner can not be identified, have vehicle towed by law enforcement.

Actions that May Bear Some Cost:

• Consider installing telephone caller I.D., record phone calls, if necessary.
• Increase perimeter lighting.
• Deploy visible security cameras and motion sensors.
• Remove vegetation in and around perimeters, maintain regularly.
• Institute a robust vehicle inspection program to include checking under the undercarriage of vehicles, under the hood, and in the trunk. Provide vehicle inspection training to security personnel.
• Deploy explosive detection devices and explosive detection canine teams.
• Conduct vulnerability studies focusing on physical security, structural engineering, infrastructure engineering, power, water, and air infiltration, if feasible.
• Initiate a system to enhance mail and package screening procedures (both announced and unannounced).
• Install special locking devices on manhole covers in and around facilities.
• Implement a counter-surveillance detection program.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Load shedding in Pakistan

March 24th, 2009

It was claimed by politicians when the judiciary will be reinstated, all economic crisis will end in the country. Now after the reinstatement of Iftikhar Choudhry and other judges, we are looking any miracle which can end the load shedding. The TV media which was shouting over judiciary crisis now should shout over the load shedding and economic growth in the country. It should realize the politicians and beurocrates that paying the bills to WAPDA by them as well as by their departments is the survival of the WAPDA. Paying bills by laymen or small shopkeepers cannot survive WAPDA untill those who thief the electricity. There are so many factors for the losses of WAPDA due or Karachi Electric Supply Company due to which new sources of generation have stppoed. In my opinion, following are the factors of load shedding:

1. No new sources of generation as WAPDA have no sources.

2. Politicians who use free electricity at their homes and industries and intervention in management of WAPDA.

3. Free use of electricity in Sind and FATA or tribal areas.

4. Leakage with support of WAPDA staff.

5. Distrust by foreign investors over infrastructure of WAPDA and its mode of payment .

There may be other factors and you can mention here.

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.